| View previous topic :: View next topic | 
	
	
		| Author | Message | 
	
		| Bob the Hamster OHRRPGCE Developer
 
 
 
  
 Joined: 22 Feb 2003
 Posts: 2526
 Location: Hamster Republic (Southern California Enclave)
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 1:33 pm    Post subject: disable the "Private message" feature for my accou |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I would love to be able to disable the "private message" feature on my account. Anybody who has ever sent me a private message on Castle Paradox knows that I always sign my replies with a request that I be e-mailed next time instead. 
 But disabling PM's on an account-by-account basis isn't practical, no biggy. I can just make good on my threats to ignore my PM's for long periods of time ;)
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Fenrir-Lunaris WUT
 
 
 
  
 Joined: 03 Feb 2003
 Posts: 1747
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 1:42 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I'd love to have the ability to block PMs from select members by checking a box.  Would this be a possible feature to add? |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Eggie 
 
 
 
 Joined: 12 May 2003
 Posts: 904
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 5:17 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I don't think that it is possible to disable PMs on a phpBB forum site, 'cause I have a friend who's a head of a forum site, and I think it's phpBB, and she says that she can't even interfere with her members' PMs. Of course, this site could be different. Main point is, I have no clue. |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Cube Dimensional Traveller
 
 
 
  
 Joined: 02 Feb 2003
 Posts: 294
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2004 5:21 pm    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Nah, it's possible. It's just take some digging into the scripts, and then tweaking them. No biggie ^_^ 
 I'll see what can be done, heheh.  I'm thinking that if we were to implement something like that, you could also leave a comment behind so that people would know other means to contact the said person. For example:
 
 "The person you're trying to send a message to has disabled this feature.
 
 < user comment >
 e-mail is a much better way to contact <me>, so sent me some mail at someone@somewhere.com (^.^)b
 < /user comment >"
 
 So yeah... I think it's a good idea.
  |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Cardcaptor Stacey Mistress of the Clow
 
 
 
  
 Joined: 24 Feb 2003
 Posts: 72
 Location: With Mr.Children
 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| RedMaverickZero Three pointed, red disaster!
 Halloween 2006 Creativity Winner
 
  
 
  
 Joined: 12 Jul 2003
 Posts: 1459
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 5:05 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| I really haven't had a big problem with the PMs. However, it does add more interaction with your own PMs. So it would be like a buddy list. And you could pick the people that you want. Because if everyone has access to handpicking all 800+ users, then it could take a long time to find the person they want gone. _________________
 ---------------Projects----
 Mr.Triangle's Maze:  70%
 Takoyaki Surprise: 70%
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Jjkaybomb Brunettes have more hair
 
 
 
  
 Joined: 04 Sep 2003
 Posts: 267
 Location: Hunting with the mouse
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 9:06 am    Post subject: |   |  
				| 
 |  
				| Ive never gotten a pm ever, so I have no problems with this. _________________
 A man once said to the Universe "Sir! I exist!"
 "However," replied the Universe, "This does not create in me a sense of obigation."
 ~Stephen Crane
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		|  |