 |
Castle Paradox
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Leonhart

Joined: 25 Feb 2004 Posts: 383 Location: Philippines
|
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | I know everyone always says this but it's complete crap. Most first time games are bad because the author doesn't continue working on them/refining them or releases them too early. The fact that it's someone's first game doesn't make it inherently bad. |
Okay, okay. That was harsh. Allow me to rephrase that. You're newbie game WILL suck if you have less experience in game designing (or none at all) and arrogant enough to think that the first one's gonna be a hit.
Quote: | See... that's why I didn't get it. I'm just not hip. |
Didn't get it at first, either. _________________ The man who smiles when things go wrong has thought of someone to blame it on.
- Robert Bloch |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rya.Reisender Snippy

Joined: 18 Jan 2008 Posts: 821
|
Posted: Mon Jul 28, 2008 10:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I got it because I already know the way Newbie Power writes (he already used "this" before I think in the Xerion thread where it was more obvious what he meant).
@Newbie_Power
The copy game thingy was a response to the cliche discussion (cliche automatically means that you copy something existing).
Quote: | What you said here is obvious to most people. What everyone else is talking about are more specific mistakes that they learned from, not that "they simply got better", which is always easy to tell. |
It was a reply to Surlaw who claimed that the first game can be good. If you think my argumentation is obvious then that just means you strongly agree with me and no further argumentation is needed. _________________ Snippy:
"curt or sharp, esp. in a condescending way" (Oxford American Dictionary)
"fault-finding, snappish, sharp" (Concise Oxford Dictionary, UK)
1. short-tempered, snappish, 2. unduly brief or curt (Merriam-Webster Dictionary) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Newbie_Power

Joined: 04 Sep 2006 Posts: 1762
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | It sounds a bit harsh but... if you can only make games by copying other games you shouldn't be making games to begin with. Just go write a book or make beautiful pictures or whatever you are really good in. |
Cliches are overused plot elements, that doesn't necessarily mean that they are copying other works, it just means they suck.
I agree that copying from other games is incredibly wrong, but is also a very different matter than cliches, which can affect original stories if done poorly.
Quote: | It was a reply to Surlaw who claimed that the first game can be good. | Because it can? It's not impossible.
Quote: | If you think my argumentation is obvious then that just means you strongly agree with me and no further argumentation is needed. | I get very annoyed when people go out and explain the obvious like we're morons. _________________
TheGiz> Am I the only one who likes to imagine that Elijah Wood's character in Back to the Future 2, the kid at the Wild Gunman machine in the Cafe 80's, is some future descendant of the AVGN? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rya.Reisender Snippy

Joined: 18 Jan 2008 Posts: 821
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 7:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
But if there's a cliche there should be at least one game that is like that, otherwise it doesn't make sense for such a cliche to exist. So if you use a cliche you are automatically copying all games that are the reason for this cliche.
Quote: | I get very annoyed when people go out and explain the obvious like we're morons. |
Um... I don't think you get it. Someone said something, I proved him wrong by using a simple explanation. You say it's too obvious and only morons need that explanation. So you indirectly say the person I proved wrong is a moron. >_>
On the other hand you say that person is correct which is even more confusing!
Also "If you don't want to be treaten like morons, then don't behave like morons." _________________ Snippy:
"curt or sharp, esp. in a condescending way" (Oxford American Dictionary)
"fault-finding, snappish, sharp" (Concise Oxford Dictionary, UK)
1. short-tempered, snappish, 2. unduly brief or curt (Merriam-Webster Dictionary) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Meatballsub Divine Bovine

Joined: 16 Jun 2003 Posts: 437 Location: Northwest Georgia
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 7:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rya.Reisender wrote: | But if there's a cliche there should be at least one game that is like that, otherwise it doesn't make sense for such a cliche to exist. So if you use a cliche you are automatically copying all games that are the reason for this cliche.
|
Do you argue just for the sake of arguing? By saying this, you are might as well say that everyone is copying something, or being "cliche". Unless you make a game about a toaster that finds his left foot in his mother-in-law's basement, then you are doing something that has been done before.
My question is why argue this until you are blue in the face when everyone is somewhat guilty of this with their games?
You are way too critical for your own good, dude. _________________ MOCBJ Software - My Games
The Hamster Wheel - OHRRPGCE Information Database |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TwinHamster ♫ Furious souls, burn eternally! ♫

Joined: 07 Mar 2004 Posts: 1352
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 7:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Are cliches really that terrible?
I mean, there's definitely a reason why people keep using them: They Work
You can use cliches and still be original, just add your own twist to them.
Now, generic properties in games.
Ugh. These are bad. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rya.Reisender Snippy

Joined: 18 Jan 2008 Posts: 821
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 8:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, only fully unique games will always be on another level. Compared to unique games other games are worthless crap no matter how much effort has been put into them. MMORPGs and JRPGs are really hated by game journalists mainly because they are all the same. Yes there are exceptions and yes those exceptions are the games that are discussed by them and then get as famous as Cave Story or Touhou or Passage / Gravitation or even Immortal Defense or Orchard's games except Motherland.
It basically is like this:
10 - Unique games
9 -
8 -
7 -
6 -
5 -
4 -
3 - Really epic games of a known genre
2 - Enjoyable games of a known genre
1 - The other useless copy crap
(between 3 and 10 is basically known genres with certain unique additions) _________________ Snippy:
"curt or sharp, esp. in a condescending way" (Oxford American Dictionary)
"fault-finding, snappish, sharp" (Concise Oxford Dictionary, UK)
1. short-tempered, snappish, 2. unduly brief or curt (Merriam-Webster Dictionary) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
The Wobbler

Joined: 06 Feb 2003 Posts: 2221
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Note from Castle Paradox Administration: | This content has been removed by the user. Contact the original author and link them to this post if you wish to view the original content. Only the author can remove the tags hiding this content. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
8bit Clutcher of toes.

Joined: 01 Jul 2008 Posts: 110 Location: In the thoughts and dreams of all the world's children.
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 8:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Meatballsub wrote: | Unless you make a game about a toaster that finds his left foot in his mother-in-law's basement, then you are doing something that has been done before. |
Now that sounds like a GAME!  _________________ Peace and love. Peace and love. No more autographs. Peace and love. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rya.Reisender Snippy

Joined: 18 Jan 2008 Posts: 821
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 8:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Although this is somewhat true I don't like the wording.
I argue because I enjoy argueing and because I think that not every single small detail has been considered yet. Not just for the 'sake of argueing'.
Well sometimes I also argue because I know I am right and want to explain it to others and I wouldn't keep argueing eternally, I only continue until every single person that posted in that thread agrees with me, then I'd stop. :-)
Quote: | Now that sounds like a GAME! Big grin |
Yes that's my point. Such a game would be awesome. _________________ Snippy:
"curt or sharp, esp. in a condescending way" (Oxford American Dictionary)
"fault-finding, snappish, sharp" (Concise Oxford Dictionary, UK)
1. short-tempered, snappish, 2. unduly brief or curt (Merriam-Webster Dictionary) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
8bit Clutcher of toes.

Joined: 01 Jul 2008 Posts: 110 Location: In the thoughts and dreams of all the world's children.
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 8:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rya.Reisender wrote: | I argue because I enjoy argueing and because I think that not every single small detail has been considered yet. Not just for the 'sake of argueing'. |
So... now you are argueing about the way in which you argue? You know, I think Surlaw may have a point... _________________ Peace and love. Peace and love. No more autographs. Peace and love. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Rya.Reisender Snippy

Joined: 18 Jan 2008 Posts: 821
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 8:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dunno about you but these new game design threads are really enjoyable for me. :-) _________________ Snippy:
"curt or sharp, esp. in a condescending way" (Oxford American Dictionary)
"fault-finding, snappish, sharp" (Concise Oxford Dictionary, UK)
1. short-tempered, snappish, 2. unduly brief or curt (Merriam-Webster Dictionary) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
8bit Clutcher of toes.

Joined: 01 Jul 2008 Posts: 110 Location: In the thoughts and dreams of all the world's children.
|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sheesh.  _________________ Peace and love. Peace and love. No more autographs. Peace and love. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Chenzi User was banned for this post

Joined: 02 Aug 2003 Posts: 190 Location: Grand Rapids, MI
|
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 4:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
I hate to tell you Rya, but you have no fucking clue what you're talking about. Cliché games are the top market sellers. When a "completely original" game hits the market it has a 90% chance of absolutely bombing, and a 10% chance of succeeding.
Examples of Cliched Success: Final Fantasy VII (Steampunk, giant swords, giant hair, save the world story, love stories, etc)
Example of Original Success: Disgaea (This game has so much original stuff thrown together that it's almost overwhelming at times. The only thing cliched about this some aspects of the story, but even then, it's as a parody.)
Example of Original Failure: Legend of Legaia (Good game, had fighting game elements mixed in with the typical role playing game atmosphere. A plot that most people wouldn't touch with a ten foot pole, but its sales were horrible, barely enough to make a sequel).
Examples of Cliched Failure: I'm sure there's one, but someone's gonna have to help me out with this one.
This is of course, talking about market success/failure as opposed to enjoyability factor. Some original game can be really enjoyable, but if I've realized anything over the years is that people who play RPGs want to see main things:
1. Increasingly large numbers, denoting damage/money/another variable.
2. The same story that they've seen a million times, change scares people.
3. Replayability _________________ Allow me to preemptively disclose that I probably hate the person posting below, including myself. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Chenzi User was banned for this post

Joined: 02 Aug 2003 Posts: 190 Location: Grand Rapids, MI
|
Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 4:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Also, getting back to this thread, asking for too much help is in regards to a newbie game. Seeing how I've release plenty of titles on my own and in collaboration with others, it's laughable to see people trying to throw what I said in my face. _________________ Allow me to preemptively disclose that I probably hate the person posting below, including myself. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|